✦ Urza's 99
← Back
Kaza, Roil Chaser
MTGO 0.10 tix

Kaza, Roil Chaser

{U}{R}

Legendary Creature — Human Wizard

Flying, haste

{T}: The next instant or sorcery spell you cast this turn costs {X} less to cast, where X is the number of Wizards you control as this ability resolves.

1 / 2

FlyingHaste
Set
Magic Online Promos (PRM #83806)
Rarity
Rare
Mana value
2
Released
2020-10-30
Artist
Ekaterina Burmak
EDHREC rank
#9,203
Colour identity
{R}{U}
Finishes
Nonfoil, Foil
Served from
Local database

Commander bracket

1 +
Fits any bracket
No Game Changer, land denial, extra turns or two-card combos.

Derived from card traits, not a ruling — bracket rules turn on how a deck intends to use a card. Bracket rules

EDHREC

Salt Score 0.58
How much players resent seeing this card. The scale tops out around 3.1.
Can be your commander

Combos 5

Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Archaeomancer
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
80 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Izzet Chronarch
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
4 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Shipwreck Dowser
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
3 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Salvager of Secrets
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
2 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Revolutionist
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
0 decks Commander Spellbook ↗

Commander recommendations

Top synergy 50

Played far more in this commander's decks than elsewhere.

  1. Azami, Lady of Scrolls 61 %+60.3 %
  2. Jaya's Immolating Inferno 59 %+54.5 %
  3. Clever Conjurer 53 %+53.0 %
  4. Stonybrook Banneret 52 %+51.1 %
  5. Goblin Electromancer 78 %+50.3 %
  6. Aphetto Alchemist 48 %+47.0 %
  7. Riptide Laboratory 52 %+46.8 %
  8. Comet Storm 52 %+46.5 %
  9. Archaeomancer 49 %+45.8 %
  10. Finale of Revelation 52 %+45.5 %
  11. Wizards of Thay 48 %+45.5 %
  12. Dualcaster Mage 52 %+44.4 %
  13. Crackle with Power 53 %+44.3 %
  14. Step Through 47 %+44.0 %
  15. Baral, Chief of Compliance 51 %+43.8 %
  16. Docent of Perfection 45 %+43.5 %
  17. Pull from Tomorrow 49 %+42.9 %
  18. Siren Stormtamer 46 %+42.4 %
  19. Mana Sculpt 49 %+41.7 %
  20. Electrodominance 48 %+41.3 %
  21. Stormcatch Mentor 63 %+40.3 %
  22. Wizard's Retort 40 %+37.9 %
  23. Fatestitcher 37 %+37.1 %
  24. Path of Ancestry 51 %+36.3 %
  25. Naru Meha, Master Wizard 35 %+34.7 %
  26. Puppeteer 33 %+32.5 %
  27. Flame of Anor 42 %+31.2 %
  28. Hydro-Channeler 31 %+29.5 %
  29. Apex of Power 33 %+29.5 %
  30. Malevolent Hermit 30 %+29.3 %
  31. Volshe Tideturner 30 %+29.2 %
  32. Curse of the Swine 34 %+28.6 %
  33. Expansion // Explosion 32 %+26.5 %
  34. Jori En, Ruin Diver 31 %+26.0 %
  35. Rite of Replication 32 %+25.9 %
  36. The Emperor of Palamecia 31 %+25.8 %
  37. Banefire 28 %+25.8 %
  38. Archmage of Echoes 25 %+24.7 %
  39. Sublime Epiphany 28 %+24.6 %
  40. Archmage Emeritus 59 %+24.6 %
  41. Storm King's Thunder 27 %+24.5 %
  42. Adeliz, the Cinder Wind 26 %+24.3 %
  43. Cyclone Summoner 24 %+23.4 %
  44. Galvanic Iteration 32 %+23.3 %
  45. Nimbleclaw Adept 24 %+23.1 %
  46. Faerie Seer 23 %+22.7 %
  47. Windrider Wizard 23 %+22.6 %
  48. Harmonic Prodigy 40 %+22.5 %
  49. Distant Melody 25 %+22.4 %
  50. Sigil Tracer 22 %+21.7 %

Most included 50

Highest share of decks running them, distinctive or not.

  1. Island 99 %+0.9 %
  2. Mountain 98 %+0.6 %
  3. Command Tower 83 %-4.1 %
  4. Goblin Electromancer 78 %+50.3 %
  5. Sol Ring 71 %-14.9 %
  6. Arcane Signet 69 %-13.2 %
  7. Sulfur Falls 67 %0.0 %
  8. Stormcatch Mentor 63 %+40.3 %
  9. Azami, Lady of Scrolls 61 %+60.3 %
  10. Jaya's Immolating Inferno 59 %+54.5 %
  11. Archmage Emeritus 59 %+24.6 %
  12. Shivan Reef 59 %-1.1 %
  13. Clever Conjurer 53 %+53.0 %
  14. Crackle with Power 53 %+44.3 %
  15. Finale of Revelation 52 %+45.5 %
  16. Riptide Laboratory 52 %+46.8 %
  17. Dualcaster Mage 52 %+44.4 %
  18. Comet Storm 52 %+46.5 %
  19. Stonybrook Banneret 52 %+51.1 %
  20. Baral, Chief of Compliance 51 %+43.8 %
  21. Reliquary Tower 51 %+2.4 %
  22. Path of Ancestry 51 %+36.3 %
  23. Mana Sculpt 49 %+41.7 %
  24. Pull from Tomorrow 49 %+42.9 %
  25. Archaeomancer 49 %+45.8 %
  26. Wizards of Thay 48 %+45.5 %
  27. Electrodominance 48 %+41.3 %
  28. Aphetto Alchemist 48 %+47.0 %
  29. Frostboil Snarl 47 %+3.2 %
  30. Izzet Signet 47 %-7.4 %
  31. Step Through 47 %+44.0 %
  32. Siren Stormtamer 46 %+42.4 %
  33. Cascade Bluffs 46 %+0.2 %
  34. Docent of Perfection 45 %+43.5 %
  35. Counterspell 44 %-7.3 %
  36. Mystic Sanctuary 43 %+16.4 %
  37. Izzet Boilerworks 43 %+8.2 %
  38. Flame of Anor 42 %+31.2 %
  39. Stormcarved Coast 42 %-2.1 %
  40. Steam Vents 42 %-8.2 %
  41. Talisman of Creativity 41 %-12.7 %
  42. Temple of Epiphany 41 %+2.5 %
  43. Harmonic Prodigy 40 %+22.5 %
  44. Wizard's Retort 40 %+37.9 %
  45. Frantic Search 38 %-3.5 %
  46. Mana Geyser 38 %+14.2 %
  47. Fatestitcher 37 %+37.1 %
  48. Training Center 36 %-6.2 %
  49. Naru Meha, Master Wizard 35 %+34.7 %
  50. Archmage of Runes 34 %+21.6 %

Format legality

Standard Not legal
Pioneer Legal
Modern Legal
Legacy Legal
Vintage Legal
Pauper Not legal
Commander Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Brawl Legal
Standard Brawl Not legal
Historic Legal
Timeless Legal
Alchemy Not legal
Penny Legal
Premodern Not legal
PreDH Not legal
Pauper EDH Not legal
Old School Not legal
Future Not legal
Gladiator Legal
All printingsScryfall ↗Edhrec ↗

Rulings

  • 2020-09-25

    Kaza's cost reduction can reduce only generic mana in a spell's cost. It can't reduce colored mana requirements.

  • 2020-09-25

    To determine the total cost of a spell, start with the mana cost or alternative cost you're paying, add any cost increases, then apply any cost reductions (such as that of Kaza's activated ability). The mana value of the spell is determined only by its mana cost, no matter what the total cost to cast the spell was.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.