✦ Urza's 99
← Back
Kaza, Roil Chaser
MTGO 0.17 tix

Kaza, Roil Chaser

{U}{R}

Legendary Creature — Human Wizard

Flying, haste

{T}: The next instant or sorcery spell you cast this turn costs {X} less to cast, where X is the number of Wizards you control as this ability resolves.

1 / 2

FlyingHaste
Set
Magic Online Promos (PRM #83806)
Rarity
Rare
Mana value
2
Released
2020-10-30
Artist
Ekaterina Burmak
EDHREC rank
#9,003
Colour identity
{R}{U}
Finishes
Nonfoil, Foil
Served from
Local database

Commander bracket

1 +
Fits any bracket
No Game Changer, land denial, extra turns or two-card combos.

Derived from card traits, not a ruling — bracket rules turn on how a deck intends to use a card. Bracket rules

EDHREC

Salt Score 0.21
How much players resent seeing this card. The scale tops out around 3.1.
Can be your commander

Combos 5

Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Archaeomancer
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
85 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Shipwreck Dowser
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
4 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Izzet Chronarch
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
3 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Salvager of Secrets
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
2 decks Commander Spellbook ↗
Kaza, Roil Chaser+Ghostly Flicker+Storm-Kiln Artist+Revolutionist
{U}{R}
Infinite artifact ETBInfinite artifact LTBInfinite creature ETBInfinite creature LTBInfinite magecraft triggersInfinite storm count
0 decks Commander Spellbook ↗

Commander recommendations

Top synergy 50

Played far more in this commander's decks than elsewhere.

  1. Azami, Lady of Scrolls 60 %+59.7 %
  2. Jaya's Immolating Inferno 58 %+53.4 %
  3. Clever Conjurer 53 %+52.8 %
  4. Goblin Electromancer 77 %+50.3 %
  5. Stonybrook Banneret 51 %+50.2 %
  6. Aphetto Alchemist 48 %+47.6 %
  7. Riptide Laboratory 52 %+46.7 %
  8. Comet Storm 51 %+46.2 %
  9. Archaeomancer 49 %+45.7 %
  10. Finale of Revelation 52 %+45.6 %
  11. Wizards of Thay 48 %+45.2 %
  12. Crackle with Power 54 %+44.5 %
  13. Dualcaster Mage 52 %+44.3 %
  14. Step Through 47 %+44.0 %
  15. Baral, Chief of Compliance 51 %+43.7 %
  16. Docent of Perfection 44 %+42.5 %
  17. Pull from Tomorrow 48 %+42.1 %
  18. Siren Stormtamer 45 %+41.4 %
  19. Mana Sculpt 48 %+41.3 %
  20. Electrodominance 47 %+40.7 %
  21. Stormcatch Mentor 62 %+39.7 %
  22. Fatestitcher 37 %+37.0 %
  23. Wizard's Retort 38 %+36.7 %
  24. Path of Ancestry 51 %+36.1 %
  25. Naru Meha, Master Wizard 35 %+34.3 %
  26. Flame of Anor 44 %+32.8 %
  27. Puppeteer 32 %+31.8 %
  28. Malevolent Hermit 30 %+29.0 %
  29. Apex of Power 32 %+28.9 %
  30. Volshe Tideturner 29 %+28.4 %
  31. Curse of the Swine 33 %+27.9 %
  32. Hydro-Channeler 29 %+27.4 %
  33. Expansion // Explosion 32 %+26.1 %
  34. The Emperor of Palamecia 31 %+25.8 %
  35. Rite of Replication 32 %+25.8 %
  36. Jori En, Ruin Diver 30 %+25.4 %
  37. Banefire 27 %+25.3 %
  38. Sublime Epiphany 28 %+24.9 %
  39. Storm King's Thunder 27 %+24.4 %
  40. Adeliz, the Cinder Wind 25 %+24.2 %
  41. Archmage Emeritus 59 %+24.1 %
  42. Archmage of Echoes 24 %+23.6 %
  43. Cyclone Summoner 24 %+23.0 %
  44. Galvanic Iteration 31 %+22.9 %
  45. Harmonic Prodigy 41 %+22.9 %
  46. Faerie Seer 23 %+22.6 %
  47. Nimbleclaw Adept 23 %+22.4 %
  48. Distant Melody 25 %+22.1 %
  49. Windrider Wizard 23 %+22.1 %
  50. Sigil Tracer 22 %+21.8 %

Most included 50

Highest share of decks running them, distinctive or not.

  1. Island 98 %+0.6 %
  2. Mountain 98 %+0.3 %
  3. Command Tower 82 %-4.5 %
  4. Goblin Electromancer 77 %+50.3 %
  5. Sol Ring 70 %-15.8 %
  6. Sulfur Falls 68 %+1.0 %
  7. Arcane Signet 68 %-13.9 %
  8. Stormcatch Mentor 62 %+39.7 %
  9. Azami, Lady of Scrolls 60 %+59.7 %
  10. Shivan Reef 59 %-0.9 %
  11. Archmage Emeritus 59 %+24.1 %
  12. Jaya's Immolating Inferno 58 %+53.4 %
  13. Crackle with Power 54 %+44.5 %
  14. Clever Conjurer 53 %+52.8 %
  15. Finale of Revelation 52 %+45.6 %
  16. Riptide Laboratory 52 %+46.7 %
  17. Dualcaster Mage 52 %+44.3 %
  18. Comet Storm 51 %+46.2 %
  19. Baral, Chief of Compliance 51 %+43.7 %
  20. Reliquary Tower 51 %+2.7 %
  21. Path of Ancestry 51 %+36.1 %
  22. Stonybrook Banneret 51 %+50.2 %
  23. Archaeomancer 49 %+45.7 %
  24. Aphetto Alchemist 48 %+47.6 %
  25. Mana Sculpt 48 %+41.3 %
  26. Pull from Tomorrow 48 %+42.1 %
  27. Wizards of Thay 48 %+45.2 %
  28. Electrodominance 47 %+40.7 %
  29. Frostboil Snarl 47 %+2.9 %
  30. Cascade Bluffs 47 %+1.1 %
  31. Step Through 47 %+44.0 %
  32. Izzet Signet 46 %-8.3 %
  33. Siren Stormtamer 45 %+41.4 %
  34. Docent of Perfection 44 %+42.5 %
  35. Counterspell 44 %-7.8 %
  36. Flame of Anor 44 %+32.8 %
  37. Mystic Sanctuary 44 %+17.0 %
  38. Stormcarved Coast 43 %-1.7 %
  39. Steam Vents 43 %-7.6 %
  40. Izzet Boilerworks 42 %+8.5 %
  41. Harmonic Prodigy 41 %+22.9 %
  42. Talisman of Creativity 41 %-13.1 %
  43. Temple of Epiphany 40 %+2.4 %
  44. Wizard's Retort 38 %+36.7 %
  45. Frantic Search 38 %-3.3 %
  46. Mana Geyser 38 %+14.0 %
  47. Fatestitcher 37 %+37.0 %
  48. Training Center 37 %-5.2 %
  49. Naru Meha, Master Wizard 35 %+34.3 %
  50. Archmage of Runes 34 %+21.3 %

Format legality

Standard Not legal
Pioneer Legal
Modern Legal
Legacy Legal
Vintage Legal
Pauper Not legal
Commander Legal
Oathbreaker Legal
Duel Commander Legal
Brawl Legal
Standard Brawl Not legal
Historic Legal
Timeless Legal
Alchemy Not legal
Penny Legal
Premodern Not legal
PreDH Not legal
Pauper EDH Not legal
Old School Not legal
Future Not legal
Gladiator Legal
All printingsScryfall ↗Edhrec ↗

Rulings

  • 2020-09-25

    Kaza's cost reduction can reduce only generic mana in a spell's cost. It can't reduce colored mana requirements.

  • 2020-09-25

    To determine the total cost of a spell, start with the mana cost or alternative cost you're paying, add any cost increases, then apply any cost reductions (such as that of Kaza's activated ability). The mana value of the spell is determined only by its mana cost, no matter what the total cost to cast the spell was.

An unhandled error has occurred. Reload 🗙

Rejoining the server...

Rejoin failed... trying again in seconds.

Failed to rejoin.
Please retry or reload the page.

The session has been paused by the server.

Failed to resume the session.
Please retry or reload the page.